Photo by: Photo by: Gina Coleman/WeedmapsImage lightbox
THC is just one variable, and focusing on it alone overlooks how cannabinoids, terpenes, and cultivation quality work together to shape effects.
In practice, many consumers find that strains with moderate THC and well-developed terpene profiles feel more balanced and enjoyable than options built purely around potency.
Why THC numbers became inflated
The THC arms race wasn't driven by consumer demand alone. It's rooted in how cannabis testing is structured: growers and brands choose which lab tests their products, and labs compete for that business. Labs that consistently report higher THC percentages attract more clients, creating financial pressure to inflate results. This practice, known as "lab shopping," means advertised THC levels often reflect which lab was chosen rather than the flower's actual potency. Some states have implemented stricter oversight, but many markets still operate without meaningful regulation of testing accuracy.
How THC became the default metric
As legal cannabis markets developed, THC emerged as the simplest metric for compliance and marketing. It was measurable, could be displayed as a single number, and fit into familiar frameworks like alcohol proof—higher numbers suggested stronger effects.
Early regulations prioritized THC testing for compliance but didn't require detailed terpene analysis or quality indicators. As a result, THC percentage became the most visible information on product labels and dispensary menus, while factors like terpene content, cultivation methods, and curing quality received less emphasis.
Why the focus stuck
Consumer interest in potency created a marketing opportunity that industry practices amplified into THC dominance. Dispensaries price-tiered products by THC percentage, creating artificial quality hierarchies where 25% flower commanded premium prices over 18% options regardless of terpene profile or cultivation quality. Menu displays defaulted to THC sorting, and budtenders—often lacking training on terpene effects—recommended "the strongest option" as shorthand.
Once THC became the primary sales driver, testing itself grew less reliable. Brands could shop between labs for higher results, and labs faced competitive pressure to deliver favorable numbers. This created a market where advertised THC percentages often reflect lab selection rather than actual potency—a problem that persists in many markets today.
The result is a system where THC dominates purchasing decisions while the factors that actually shape cannabis experiences remain underemphasized.
Consumer demand fueled the THC arms race
Image lightbox
Photo by: Gina Coleman/Weedmaps
As legal markets expanded, THC percentage became the most visible product metric—partly because early regulations required it, partly because it simplified marketing. Dispensaries sorted menus by THC%, price-tiered products accordingly, and trained staff to recommend "the strongest option." Many consumers began treating THC like alcohol proof, assuming higher numbers meant better quality.
This created pressure throughout the supply chain. Growers prioritized strains that tested high, often at the expense of terpene complexity and minor cannabinoids. Testing labs faced competitive pressure to deliver favorable results, leading to inflated numbers and cherry-picked samples. Products bred and marketed for extreme potency often delivered flat, one-dimensional experiences despite impressive test results.
The market rewarded THC numbers, not necessarily better cannabis, and those numbers became increasingly unreliable as the arms race intensified.
Why THC percentage tells only part of the story
THC percentage suggests precision, but it doesn't reflect how cannabis actually feels. When a high-THC strain doesn't meet expectations, it's usually because the experience depends on multiple compounds working together—and because the advertised number may not reflect what's actually in the product.
What THC percentage doesn't account for:
- Terpene presence and balance — Aromatic compounds that influence effects and flavor
- Minor cannabinoids — CBG, CBN, CBC, and others that contribute to overall experience
- Cultivation and post-harvest quality — Growing conditions, curing, and storage affect potency and flavor
- Testing accuracy — Lab shopping, sample selection bias, and timing variations mean advertised percentages often don't match actual flower
- THC degradation — Potency decreases over time due to light, heat, and air exposure; flower tested at packaging may be significantly lower by purchase
The entourage effect adds important context
Cannabinoids and terpenes interact to shape flavor and perceived effects. Because of this interaction, strains with moderate THC and strong terpene profiles often feel more balanced than higher-THC options with limited supporting compounds.
This helps explain why many long-standing strains remain popular without pushing extreme THC levels; their appeal comes from synergy, not raw potency.
Understanding the entourage effect matters even more when you consider that THC percentages themselves are often unreliable.
Lab Testing Creates Misleading Numbers
Cannabis flower quality suffers from inconsistent testing standards across states and labs. The same batch tested at different facilities can produce meaningfully different THC results, depending on methodology and sampling practices.
Testing problems include:
- Sample selection bias — Labs typically test small samples from large batches. If the submitted material isn't representative of the whole lot, reported potency may not reflect what most consumers receive.
- Lab shopping — In markets where producers can choose their testing lab, competitive pressures can create incentives for higher reported THC results rather than stricter consistency.
- Timing variations — THC gradually degrades when exposed to light, heat, and oxygen. Flower tested at packaging may test lower weeks or months later depending on storage conditions.
- Reporting differences — Some labels emphasize total potential THC (which includes THCa converted using a standard formula), while others highlight delta-9 THC alone. These reporting differences can make similar products appear significantly different on paper.
Taken together, these factors mean THC percentages should be viewed as estimates rather than precise guarantees. A product labeled 25% may test somewhat differently under alternate lab conditions or after extended storage, even when handled legally and properly.
When combined, these factors mean the flower you purchase may not perfectly match the number on the label. Variations in sampling, reporting methods, and storage conditions can create noticeable differences between advertised potency and real-world experience.
Given these limitations, consumers are better served by focusing on product freshness, visible trichome coverage, aroma intensity, and user reviews rather than relying on advertised THC percentages alone.
What actually shapes cannabis quality and effects
The most reliable indicators of quality go beyond potency. Flavor, consistency, and overall experience are influenced by how a strain is grown, handled, and preserved.
Terpene profiles influence the experience
Terpenes give cannabis its aroma and directly influence how effects are perceived. Common terpenes and their associations include:
- Myrcene (earthy, herbal) — linked to relaxation and sedation
- Limonene (citrus) — associated with uplifting, mood-enhancing effects
- Pinene (pine) — may support focus and alertness
- Caryophyllene (pepper, spice) — interacts with cannabinoid receptors
Look for flower with 2%+ total terpenes, which indicates the product was grown and cured to preserve aromatic compounds. Terpene profiles appear on lab reports (COAs), which reputable dispensaries provide via QR codes or websites. Dispensaries that make this information easily accessible tend to prioritize transparency over THC-focused marketing.
Cultivation practices matter
How cannabis is grown has a direct impact on its final character. Factors like environment, nutrients, harvesting, and trimming all affect trichome preservation and flavor.
Quality indicators include:
- Hand-trimmed flower, which preserves trichomes better than machine-trimmed
- Small-batch production, which typically receives more attention than mass production
- Extended curing (2+ weeks minimum) to develop flavor and smoothness
- Controlled environment growing for precise quality control
These details aren't always advertised, but asking budtenders about cultivation practices helps identify quality-focused producers.
Shopping for quality over potency
Smart cannabis shopping means treating THC percentage as one factor among many, not the primary quality indicator. The details that matter most are the ones that help predict how a strain actually feels, not just how it tests.
User reviews are a strong starting point. Look for patterns in effect descriptions—calm, focused, uplifted, or clear-headed—across multiple reviews. Ignore reviews focused only on "strongest ever" or generic praise without specific details.
Terpene profiles add another layer of context. Different terpene combinations influence flavor and perceived effects, often making moderate-THC flower (15-22%) with 2%+ terpenes feel more complete than higher-THC options with limited aromatic complexity.
Check for freshness indicators. Package dates within 3-6 months, proper airtight and light-resistant packaging, and visible intact trichomes all signal better-preserved quality than older product regardless of original THC percentage.
Bottom line
Image lightbox
High-THC flower doesn't always justify its price, and many well-rounded strains get overlooked because they don't lead with big numbers. Shopping beyond THC helps surface better value and more dependable experiences.
Order flower and other cannabis products for pickup for delivery from a dispensary near you.
